POLSKI  ENGLISH

BIOETYKA / WPROWADZENIE - Przeglądy aktów prawnych
Prawo do decydowania o sobie

Prawa o zasięgu światowym

Deklaracja Lizbońska o Prawach Pacjenta – Światowe Stowarzyszenie Lekarzy (WMA) 1981


  1. Right to freedom of choice

    1. The patient has the right to choose freely and change his/her physician and hospital or health service institution, regardless of whether they are based in the private or public sector.

    2. The patient has the right to ask for the opinion of another physician at any stage.

  2. Right to self-determination

    1. The patient has the right to self-determination, to make free decisions regarding himself/herself. The physician will inform the patient of the consequences of his/her decisions.

    2. A mentally competent adult patient has the right to give or withhold consent to any diagnostic procedure or therapy. The patient has the right to the information necessary to make his/her decisions. The patient should understand clearly what is the purpose of any test or treatment, what the results would imply, and what would be the implications of withholding consent.

    3. The patient has the right to refuse to participate in research or the teaching of medicine.

  3. The unconscious patient

    1. If the patient is unconscious or otherwise unable to express his/her will, informed consent must be obtained whenever possible, from a legally entitled representative.

    2. If a legally entitled representative is not available, but a medical intervention is urgently needed, consent of the patient may be presumed, unless it is obvious and beyond any doubt on the basis of the patient's previous firm expression or conviction that he/she would refuse consent to the intervention in that situation.

    3. However, physicians should always try to save the life of a patient unconscious due to a suicide attempt.

  4. The legally incompetent patient

    1. If a patient is a minor or otherwise legally incompetent, the consent of a legally entitled representative is required in some jurisdictions. Nevertheless the patient must be involved in the decision-making to the fullest extent allowed by his/her capacity.

    2. If the legally incompetent patient can make rational decisions, his/her decisions must be respected, and he/she has the right to forbid the disclosure of information to his/her legally entitled representative.

    3. If the patient's legally entitled representative, or a person authorized by the patient, forbids treatment which is, in the opinion of the physician, in the patient's best interest, the physician should challenge this decision in the relevant legal or other institution. In case of emergency, the physician will act in the patient's best interest.

  5. Procedures against the patient's will

Diagnostic procedures or treatment against the patient's will can be carried out only in exceptional cases, if specifically permitted by law and conforming to the principles of medical ethics.