| |||
BIOETYKA / WPROWADZENIE - Przeglądy aktów prawnychHealthcare Systems: The USA – Civitas 2002 (2013) | |||
Introduction s. 2The health sector in the United States is characterised by a mix of public and private funding and provision; as such, it is not governed by a single philosophy. Public sector health programmes s. 2In 2009 the US spent a total of $2.5 trillion on healthcare or approximately 18% of GDP; 44.7% of that total expenditure was spent by the US government. Two public healthcare programmes are dominant in the United States - Medicare and Medicaid - and both were created in 1965 under Lyndon Johnson’s presidency and run by the US federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Medicare is the federal government’s health programme that primarily serves Americans over the age of 65, whilst Medicaid is a joint federal-state programme principally designed to finance healthcare for the poor. Both provide care for the disabled. Together, Medicare and Medicaid cover approximately 87 million Americans. Private sector health programmesIn 2010 195.9 million people in America (64% of the population) were covered by private health insurance.In 2000 these figures were 200 million and 72% respectively, meaning that proportionately fewer people have private insurance now compared with ten years ago.24 This may suggest that access to private insurance may not be keeping pace with population growth in the US (…). Managed CareEmployer-Provided Health InsuranceInnovation: Health Savings AccountAn appealing aspect of HSAs is that they encourage individuals to stay healthy and be cost-conscious. Any money from your HSA account that is not used to pay medical expenses is yours to keep (although you will pay taxes on amount withdrawn if it is spent on non-medical expenses). The theory is therefore that consumers will be more cautious when spending their own money compared to spending money that they see only indirectly through their employer or health insurance provider. The Uninsured and the Unofficial Safety NetBeing uninsured does not mean that all medical care is out of reach. Any hospital in the United States that accepts Medicare or Medicaid patients is legally bound to provide medical treatment and stabilize any patient who presents a medical problem, whether or not that patient can pay the bill. Hospitals that treat a substantial number of poor patients, including those on Medicaid, Medicare, or without health insurance, receive a Disproportionate Share payment from the federal government to help compensate them. The uninsured also receive medical care through additional, joint private-public sector health programmes, including free clinics and Community Health Centres, described earlier. However there are many that slip through the net altogether and many will frequently wait until late stages of illness before seeking care because, in general, they will only have reliable access to emergency, not preventative care. Thus the uninsured or under-insured are more likely to face bankruptcy through illness or accident. It also makes hospital costs particularly high due to the aforementioned tendency for patients to be sicker and require more radical and expensive treatment when they finally seek help, than those who can come forward earlier. Reform of US Healthcare: the Obama AdministrationKey points included in the final Act
|